« Tidbits from the Law Firm Leadership Conference #lflc | Main | Intermedia--a better term for "social media"? »

11/21/2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516c2469e2012875c1e05c970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is social media use worthwhile if you don't have a blog?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Blogs can be the center of your social media strategy, or social networking strategy, but they are not necessarily. (EG: YouTube stars, Twitter stars - we only know these people form these mediums). Who watches the Shaytards on Youtube?!


That's a radical example, say a small business who only operates a Facebook page or a social network that allows for users to have their own blogs within the social network.


Pointing all your tools to one tool is a great strategy (depending on your goals) and pointing all tools to your blog makes sense in some situations. This may, in fact, be the norm within the legal profession.


However, I suspect this will change. I suspect strategies will differ in the future and people will be directed solely to Facebook pages or even Twitter-like feeds. Some law firms or lawyer may never have blogs and still have a successful social media presence. E.g. Me, I was known on Twitter before I started Social Media Law Student - did you even know I had a blog?! :)


Not to minimalize blogs. They do seem like more of your home when you can write in more than 140 characters. However, they are one of the many social media tools. Having the blog at the center of the wheel is a strategy but not the only one.


Just my opinion. (some may recognize it form somewhere!)

Also check out this - "Since When Are Blogs Not Social Media?" - http://www.copyblogger.com/blogs-social-media/

The comments to this entry are closed.